The Political Side Of Restraining Orders
After the Democratic convention, Barrack Obama was praised by David Arlinsky (see Boston Globe for article published) about how Obama had won with the tools and methods stylized by his late father, Saul Arlinsky.
A well known radical, Saul Arlinsky penned the book of Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. In Arlinsky's world he divided up people in the following manner: the Haves, the Have Nots, and Have-a-Little- Want Mores. His goal was to educate the Have Nots on how to siphon money from the Haves by establishing organizations with power.
To understand what Arlisnky was trying to achieve – it is important to know the United States was formed as a Republic and not as a Democracy. Mob rule was not on the founders' agenda. Once half of the population understands they have the ability to tax the other 50 percent, corruption will erupt.
Take for example when the US elections are held it's not the people who vote for president but rather the Electoral College. If the House passes a vote, it's the representatives who decide and not the people – as a means of avoiding "mob rule"."The primary idea behind this is when the "mob rules" personal rights get stomped on.
Arlinsky, however, was different. He wanted a radical change of America’s social and economic structure and wanted the U.S. to move from Capitalism to Socialism.
Arlinsky felt it was unfair that the Haves had comfort and the Have Nots did not. He understood that he needed to conjure the Have Nots, in order for them to take action toward the productive members of society. In order for Arlinsky to achieve his goals he knew it would have to be done locally via local organizers and local governments.
It is these sort of agitators, these rebels who have completely rejected the values and moral foundation of the middle class. Over the last 20 years have set out to transform and destroy the nuclear family. With the advent of VAWA (the violence against women act written by Joe Biden) in the 1990s, the agitators in government have given a green light to the states to go out and pursue men going through divorce and coach women to issue restraining orders against men.
With the exactness and peculiarity of restraining orders, men can be looking down the barrel of a loaded gun. In the event the individual screws up the procedures after an order is established, he can end up in jail.
